The marketing departs of studios have a way of misleading the viewers' expectations. How many times have you seen a trailer that has had you persuaded or dissuaded to watch a movie? Or have given you a false idea of the feel of a movie? You should take these trailers with a grain of salt. Adventureland was marketed as another Superbad. It was far from it. Not that I didn't enjoy Superbad, but Adventureland had was darker and had more depth than expected. The film had laugh out loud moments but wasn't a laugh out loud comedy. Many viewers didn't see the depth of the film but just saw it as something not as funny as Superbad. Youth in Revolt is another case. The film looked like another Micheal Cera being Micheal Cera film, but it was more of a comical melodrama that at times seemed to play off of Micheal Cera's typecast.
Well most of the time the studios aren't trying to trick you...most of the time. If you didn't know, there are two types of trailers Red band and Green band trailers. The green band trailers are what you see in the movie theaters or on tv. Most of the time this is the trailer you are exposed to. The Red band trailer is only meant to be seen by restricted audiences so this is the trailer you'll see online as an alternate trailer. The green band sometimes skews a film's feel while the red band may be more revealing.
Here is a prime example of the conflicting portrayals of Kick-Ass by the different trailers.
Kick-Ass Green band. The film looks campy and another teen action flick.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=krOzVRj9z88
Kick-Ass Red Band trailer 1 and 2. (Warning: Offensive language and situations. I am using this for an educational purpose. It is not a reflection of any messages I am trying to send.)
http://movies.ign.com/dor/objects/14276014/kick-ass/videos/kickass_trl3a_022310.html
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/3915215/kick_ass_hit_girl_red_band_trailer/
When you are viewing trailers, just remember that the trailer is not the movie but intended to get key demographics or the masses into the theaters.
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Friday, February 26, 2010
If you thought 28 Days Later was good, check this out.
Just when you thought Zombie\infection movies were all done for the French bring the heat with a hardcore horror flick called Mutants. the movie begins mostly with the same plot as 28 days later, an unknown virus gets out into the public and turns loved ones into blood thirsty cannibalistic creatures. The two main characters Marco and Sonia take refugee in a hospital out in the woods in hopes for emergency evacuation from N.O.A.H, a corporation built for fighting the deadly virus and cleansing France of the infected. Everything is going fine untill Sonia finds out that Marco has become infected. now she has to go through with waiting out for evacuation before the virus fully takes over her lovers body.
Not only does the plot set this movie apart from others but the movement and choreography of the actors that played as the infected. (they're so believable it's scary). Also the camera angles took a good roll in the movie as well, from the shakey movement in the running scenes to the extreme close ups of characters faces brought out alot of emotion and fear.
Mutants premiered on January 31 last year in the Gérardmer Film Festival and the U.S IFC company bought it recently releasing it on OnDemand subtitaled in english (lucky for us).
if you're looking for a good horror film this movie does not dissappoint. I'd have to say Mutants did better then both 28 days later as well as the sequil 28 weeks later. But that's my opinion check it out for yourself in the independent film section on OnDemand and tell me what you think.
(official teaser trailer) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34brTAzr9wE
Thursday, February 25, 2010
10 Days to Oscar: Up in the Where?
The OHS Film Institute was polarized by Ryan Bingham. Walter Kirn's character by way of director Jason Reitman's (Juno) adaptation is a corporate axeman. A lone-wolf first class flyer who is obsessed with attaining the holy grail of accumulated airline miles: 10,000,000 to be exact. In the meantime, he successfully detaches himself from any lingering human contact. He is a self-proclaimed empty backpack. A shark with no possible means of forging a meaningful relationship.
Some of our students saw him as childish and self-absorbed. Some sympathized with his disillusion and referenced possible tragic causes. Still some others (read: scruffaluffagus) saw him as a disgusting illustration of everything that's wrong with America (read: capitalism).
We spent an entire class period debating the methodology and inspiration that drives a character like this.
Reitman, in the horrible ABC film clip with Peter Travers (who incidentally, I love in print but acts like a total boob on camera) that is linked below, succintly puts an end to the argument.
Start watching at 6:29...the rest is garbage, but Reitman lays down Bingham's essence succintly. It becomes obvious that Reitman also adapted the script, because he speaks with a writer's affection for character rather than a director's affection for aesthetic. This comes through in the film and makes it a gem for viewers.
I agree with everything Reitman says, and want to leave him with the last word. At the end, he describes his role as a director much in the same way I would describe my role as a teacher.
Grab video here.
Now, for relevance to the BIG SHOUE! Up in the Air isn't the Picture of the year, but it is certainly the year's most enjoyable.
Reitman deserves Best Director for a beautifully spun tale that only uses Kirn's so-so novel as a springboard (yes, this may be one of those feeeew cases that the movie is better than the book). He also creates a zeitgeist film. Reitman used real professionals who had been recently laid off instead of using actors [for the most part, as someone in class pointed out, Zach Galifinakis and JK Simmons (possibly the most under-rated character actor of the past five years?) are doing well professionally]. This creates the movie's most memorable and crushing moments. This sobering backdrop is vital to the film's tension and believability. He also taped the wedding scene, the film's most emotionally engaging, by simply allowing a wedding to unfold.
I am so psyched about Reitman. He has all the makings and resume of a master. He will come to define film through the next ten years. And, from what I can see, if this unfolds as planned, we will be treated to a delightful array of touching, funny, character dramas. I cannot wait for him to continue to swallow Hollywood whole. Hopefully, he doesn't become singularly obsessed with one actor and one social event for the rest of his career (Spielberg = Hanks = WWII, or wait, am I getting confused with Mr. Cervi?)
The movie is Oscar's most celebrated from an acting standpoint (three total nominees). Anna Kendrick's faux-cold professional-come-determined school girl really trying to impress the old boys puts forth the film's best and most important performance. She is the only true protagonist, and her search for truth in Bingham's world mimics the audience's relationship with him. Like us, she is both strangely attracted to and repulsed by the Bingham lifestyle. She allows Clooney to be subtly charming while not abandoning Bingham's ridiculous, empty rituals and value system.
Vera Farmiga leveled me. She is every stone-stared, strong and sexy professional woman I have ever known. And I have known at least three of them.
Would I be beaten up if I were to say this is not George Clooney's best performance? Hypothetically? Is it ok to say that I think he is too likable? Could a less charming actor have delivered an edgier, more transgressive Ryan Bingham? And would that have, possibly, added a depth to the film? Not that I'm saying that. Just asking.
Oscar breathes down my neck, and Redbox will be able to mortgage my home soon because I can't bring myself to watch District 9. An alien Holocaust film? Ugh. Four movies to go, ten days to watch!
Avatar, I'm coming for you!
Some of our students saw him as childish and self-absorbed. Some sympathized with his disillusion and referenced possible tragic causes. Still some others (read: scruffaluffagus) saw him as a disgusting illustration of everything that's wrong with America (read: capitalism).
We spent an entire class period debating the methodology and inspiration that drives a character like this.
Reitman, in the horrible ABC film clip with Peter Travers (who incidentally, I love in print but acts like a total boob on camera) that is linked below, succintly puts an end to the argument.
Start watching at 6:29...the rest is garbage, but Reitman lays down Bingham's essence succintly. It becomes obvious that Reitman also adapted the script, because he speaks with a writer's affection for character rather than a director's affection for aesthetic. This comes through in the film and makes it a gem for viewers.
I agree with everything Reitman says, and want to leave him with the last word. At the end, he describes his role as a director much in the same way I would describe my role as a teacher.
Grab video here.
Now, for relevance to the BIG SHOUE! Up in the Air isn't the Picture of the year, but it is certainly the year's most enjoyable.
Reitman deserves Best Director for a beautifully spun tale that only uses Kirn's so-so novel as a springboard (yes, this may be one of those feeeew cases that the movie is better than the book). He also creates a zeitgeist film. Reitman used real professionals who had been recently laid off instead of using actors [for the most part, as someone in class pointed out, Zach Galifinakis and JK Simmons (possibly the most under-rated character actor of the past five years?) are doing well professionally]. This creates the movie's most memorable and crushing moments. This sobering backdrop is vital to the film's tension and believability. He also taped the wedding scene, the film's most emotionally engaging, by simply allowing a wedding to unfold.
I am so psyched about Reitman. He has all the makings and resume of a master. He will come to define film through the next ten years. And, from what I can see, if this unfolds as planned, we will be treated to a delightful array of touching, funny, character dramas. I cannot wait for him to continue to swallow Hollywood whole. Hopefully, he doesn't become singularly obsessed with one actor and one social event for the rest of his career (Spielberg = Hanks = WWII, or wait, am I getting confused with Mr. Cervi?)
The movie is Oscar's most celebrated from an acting standpoint (three total nominees). Anna Kendrick's faux-cold professional-come-determined school girl really trying to impress the old boys puts forth the film's best and most important performance. She is the only true protagonist, and her search for truth in Bingham's world mimics the audience's relationship with him. Like us, she is both strangely attracted to and repulsed by the Bingham lifestyle. She allows Clooney to be subtly charming while not abandoning Bingham's ridiculous, empty rituals and value system.
Vera Farmiga leveled me. She is every stone-stared, strong and sexy professional woman I have ever known. And I have known at least three of them.
Would I be beaten up if I were to say this is not George Clooney's best performance? Hypothetically? Is it ok to say that I think he is too likable? Could a less charming actor have delivered an edgier, more transgressive Ryan Bingham? And would that have, possibly, added a depth to the film? Not that I'm saying that. Just asking.
Oscar breathes down my neck, and Redbox will be able to mortgage my home soon because I can't bring myself to watch District 9. An alien Holocaust film? Ugh. Four movies to go, ten days to watch!
Avatar, I'm coming for you!
Labels:
anna kendricks,
george clooney,
jason reitman,
Oscars,
up in the air,
vera farmiga
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
If you are a fan of Star Wars or NCAA football!
http://www.ajc.com/sports/uga/is-it-a-trap-325708.html?referrer=search_buy
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Joana Newsom
Her voice is so weird. The harp is kitschy. And yet, I can't stop listening. Full albumn audio available here.
Monday, February 22, 2010
New Perspective
Our whole discussion about looking at life through the lens of another person got me thinking. Since I'm really not about to go into all of my own personal crap that I thought about, and all of that conflict and just blahh, I'm going to just say the bit about being tied down, looking at life through someone else, and Costal's words: "Just break up with them." ...All of it really made me think of a song by my favorite band, Panic! at the Disco. It's actually a song they wrote for that movie Jennifer's Body, hah go figure. Anyway, it's called New Perspective.
Here are the lyrics, just so you can take a look:
I feel the salty waves come in
I feel them crash against my skin
And I smile as I respire because I know they'll never win
There's a haze above my TV
That changes everything I see
And maybe if I continue watching
I'll lose the traits that worry me
Can we fast-forward to go down on me?
Stop there and let me correct it
I wanna live a life from a new perspective
You come along because I love your face
And I'll admire your expensive taste
And who cares divine intervention
I wanna be praised from a new perspective
But leaving now would be a good idea
So catch me up on getting out of here
Taking everything for granted but we still respect the time
We move along with some new passion knowing everything is fine
And I would wait and watch the hours fall in a hundred separate lines
But I regain repose and wonder how I ended up inside
Can we fast-forward to go down on me?
Stop there and let me correct it
I wanna live a life from a new perspective
You come along because I love your face
and I'll admire your expensive taste
And who cares divine intervention
I wanna be praised from a new perspective
But leaving now would be a good idea
So catch me up on getting out of here
More to the point, I need to show
How much I can come and go
Other plans fell through
And put a heavy load on you
I know there's no more that need be said
When I'm inching through your bed
Take a look around instead and watch me go
Stop there and let me correct it
I wanna live a life from a new perspective
You come along because I love your face
and I'll admire your expensive taste
And who cares divine intervention
I wanna be praised from a new perspective
But leaving now would be a good idea
So catch me up on getting out of here
It's not fair, just let me perfect it
Don't wanna live a life that was comprehensive
'cause seeing clear would be a bad idea
Now catch me up on getting out of here
So catch me up I'm getting out of here
Sunday, February 21, 2010
The Puppyman
I was going to get all "Costal", on this movie and write a insanely awesome critique about how bad it was, but then after about twenty minutes into writing it I realized that there was no need for all those words to illustrate one point.
This is a terrible movie!
By the end of the movie, I was praying that the werewolf came out the screen and bit me, transforming me into a werewolf, because only a fellow half human, half wolf hybrid could enjoy such a horrible film....
I Love Movies
Just a little somethin' somethin'
Check them out. =]
Diary of a Wimpy Kid
The Losers
Repomen
Check them out. =]
Diary of a Wimpy Kid
The Losers
Repomen
Saturday, February 20, 2010
@strobist, 2/20/10 17:48
David Hobby (@strobist) 2/20/10 17:48 This 5D video rig would leave @vincentlaforet crying and drinking cheap scotch on his linoleum floor: http://vimeo.com/9243537 |
Friday, February 19, 2010
Charlie Rose Talks Oscars
He is the best....another PBS joint...shut up, Em Rheault....
Kathyrn Bigelow
George Clooney
Tarantino: This is excellent advice on all writing...for all writing
Kathyrn Bigelow
George Clooney
Tarantino: This is excellent advice on all writing...for all writing
17 Days to Oscar: My Locker Still Hurts
When I was a student teacher, a frumpy, but well-meaning classroom veteran who worked across the hall passed me every morning with the same greeting:
If I were walking, he would bound beside me. A relentless Baloo to my slightly creeped out Mowgli.
"Just get through the day!"
His words became a mainstay of my student teaching experience. They echoed through the halls. They rang through my planning efforts. They hummed in my head whenever a room was deafened by student confusion. They buzzed in the students' blank stares and weary expressions. They shot me between the eyes when once, during a reading of what I thought was a profound and relevant article about Matthew Shepard, the University of Wyoming student who was tortured and killed in 1998 after "coming out" to friends, a young man rose to his feet, raised one puffy coated arm into the air and exclaimed. "If a (sic) told me he liked me, I'd shoot his ass too."
"Just get through the day!"
I rode that line. Dissected it, and then let it carry me right out of the teaching profession and into corporate America.
"Just get through the day!"
This notion resurfaced as I watched the tenser moments of Kathyrn Bigelow's Best Picture nominated, Iraq War thriller, The Hurt Locker.
Please understand, I am by no means comparing public high school teaching to defusing bombs. Well, actually, now that I look at it on paper, maybe the two do have a bit in common. Today, with a renewed understanding and genuine love of teaching, I realize that defusing potentially explosive situations is a large part of that job. And if done carelessly, people DO get hurt. At the end of tough days, it is easy to feel like a teacher fights an impossibly uphill battle. That the culmination is often as pyrrhic as war itself.
As an audience, we share the conflict. Should we follow James and proclaim him a true patriot? Or do we despise his Superman complex and crucify him for his carelessness? In a way, this ethical conflict is the heart of the Iraq War itself. By examining the duality of Sgt. James, we, in turn, assess our own feelings toward this war. Patriots or war mongers? This uncertainty drives The Hurt Locker over action film cliche and into Oscar's realm.
But then again, there's that lovable Jason Reitman...you'll just have to read on for that.
For now, "just get through the day."
"Just get through the day!"
New day, same greeting.
"Just get through the day!"
If I were standing still, he would walk right up and place both of his meaty hands on my shoulders. Punctuating his words with light, but awkward shakes.
"Just get through the day!"
If I were walking, he would bound beside me. A relentless Baloo to my slightly creeped out Mowgli.
"Just get through the day!"
His words became a mainstay of my student teaching experience. They echoed through the halls. They rang through my planning efforts. They hummed in my head whenever a room was deafened by student confusion. They buzzed in the students' blank stares and weary expressions. They shot me between the eyes when once, during a reading of what I thought was a profound and relevant article about Matthew Shepard, the University of Wyoming student who was tortured and killed in 1998 after "coming out" to friends, a young man rose to his feet, raised one puffy coated arm into the air and exclaimed. "If a (sic) told me he liked me, I'd shoot his ass too."
"Just get through the day!"
I rode that line. Dissected it, and then let it carry me right out of the teaching profession and into corporate America.
"Just get through the day!"
This notion resurfaced as I watched the tenser moments of Kathyrn Bigelow's Best Picture nominated, Iraq War thriller, The Hurt Locker.
Please understand, I am by no means comparing public high school teaching to defusing bombs. Well, actually, now that I look at it on paper, maybe the two do have a bit in common. Today, with a renewed understanding and genuine love of teaching, I realize that defusing potentially explosive situations is a large part of that job. And if done carelessly, people DO get hurt. At the end of tough days, it is easy to feel like a teacher fights an impossibly uphill battle. That the culmination is often as pyrrhic as war itself.
This is not meant to trivialize the heroics of our servicemen. Warzone bomb squads do a breath-taking, staggeringly heroic job. Our gratitude, while endless and pure, could never repay the debt.
The common thread is futility. Locker succeeds most profoundly as a war film during the moments in which the highest tension is punctuated by the deepest feelings of hopelessness. Day after day, Delta Company, the military bomb squad that the film follows, faces an endless parade of horrifying scenarios. Each day, they draw closer to their goal: the end of their tour. Each day it seems more and more impossible for them to survive their dangerous duties. Each day, the war seems more and more out of control and beyond their reach. Sgt. Sanborn and Spc. Owens, played respectively by Oscar-snubbed actors Anthony Mackie and Brian Geraghty, just want to survive. They want to go home. Their plans are derailed when their team leader dies during a diffusion and Sgt. James takes over. Played with brillant nuance and believability by Best Actor nominee Jeremy Renner, James has other plans. He is a renegade cowboy whose hero complex puts the entire company in reckless, risky situations.
Sgt. James' appeal is a credit to Renner's performance. He channels Jack Palance's bad boy smile, John Wayne's swagger and rolls them up into a modern, Kid Rock of a soldier. Despite his "devil may care" death wish, James is likable and carries a genuine passion for helping the Iraqi people. This makes his ineffably pig-headed, self-absorbed, disregaridng actions harder to stomach.
The common thread is futility. Locker succeeds most profoundly as a war film during the moments in which the highest tension is punctuated by the deepest feelings of hopelessness. Day after day, Delta Company, the military bomb squad that the film follows, faces an endless parade of horrifying scenarios. Each day, they draw closer to their goal: the end of their tour. Each day it seems more and more impossible for them to survive their dangerous duties. Each day, the war seems more and more out of control and beyond their reach. Sgt. Sanborn and Spc. Owens, played respectively by Oscar-snubbed actors Anthony Mackie and Brian Geraghty, just want to survive. They want to go home. Their plans are derailed when their team leader dies during a diffusion and Sgt. James takes over. Played with brillant nuance and believability by Best Actor nominee Jeremy Renner, James has other plans. He is a renegade cowboy whose hero complex puts the entire company in reckless, risky situations.
Sgt. James' appeal is a credit to Renner's performance. He channels Jack Palance's bad boy smile, John Wayne's swagger and rolls them up into a modern, Kid Rock of a soldier. Despite his "devil may care" death wish, James is likable and carries a genuine passion for helping the Iraqi people. This makes his ineffably pig-headed, self-absorbed, disregaridng actions harder to stomach.
The seminal scene occurs when Spc. Eldridge is being medi-vaced away. The usual war film heroics and thumbs up give way to a gut-wretching display of profanity, insecurity, hopelessness and resentment. Bigelow's brushstroke drips with realism and the futility of war.
Much has been made of the film's opening line: "War is a drug." For many critics, it stands as a testament to the perceived theme of Bigelow's film: that war is about adrenaline. But adrenaline and highs are only one side of addiction, the other side is hopeless and futility, and this is Locker's essence.
So where does it go wrong? I was hampered by the search for a plot. The movie was bomb diffusion after bomb diffusion. Literally, thrill after thrill, I found myself inventing sub-plots. Could it be that the film's plotlessness was calculated? A symbol of a war that is similarly plotless?
Either way, Renner is amazing, and easily my pick for Best Actor. He infuses ambiguous charms into a transgressive hero. In all other Academy races, Locker falls to the middle of the pack. Remember though that Oscar is a sucker for a story-line like Bigelow vs. Cameron. Read: popular but marginally proftiable indie screen Queen slays Blockbuster Ex-Hubby! Well, I'm biting that, and so will all of America! Bigelow Best Director would be exciting and long overdue homage to female film makers.
But then again, there's that lovable Jason Reitman...you'll just have to read on for that.
For now, "just get through the day."
Labels:
James Cameron,
jeremy renner,
katherine bigelow,
Oscars,
The hurt locker
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
2 things:
1. When did this become 'The Falcon Film Files'?
2. http://filmexperience.blogspot.com/ <---- is a link to a film blog that has some cool trivia. For those of us who think we're real film buffs, I assure his questions really get you..
*don't worry he posts the answers at the end of the post :)
He has some posts dedicated to the Academy Awards, check it.
2. http://filmexperience.blogspot.com/ <---- is a link to a film blog that has some cool trivia. For those of us who think we're real film buffs, I assure his questions really get you..
*don't worry he posts the answers at the end of the post :)
He has some posts dedicated to the Academy Awards, check it.
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Upular
In honor of the up coming Oscars I thought I'd post this awesome video I found on YouTube. Its a techno remix using the movie UP which is nominated for best picture and is in my personal opinion the best of the candidates that I've seen so far. Enjoy Upular by Fagotten :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVxe5NIABsI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVxe5NIABsI
Friday, February 12, 2010
Thursday, February 11, 2010
Favorites of the year
Since last years Academy Awards, what have your favorite movies of the year been.
Mine
-Up
-Inglorious Bastards
-Star Trek
- 500 Days of Summer
-Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus
-Hurt Locker
these are in no order
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
SyFy Contest
Check this out, courtesy of Andy Ho...winning package perfect for budding young filmakers like yourself. Here.
25 Days to Oscar: Remember the Titan!
2010 is a historic year for the Academy Awards, because The Blind Side may be the worst film ever nominated for Best Picture.
It slipped in because the Best Picture field was senselessly widened to ten. This was done as phase 235 of an on-going, nation-wide campaign to make all facets of American culture more accesible to the incredibly stupid. Phase One was "No Child Left Behind." Phase 233 was Snookie from "The Jersey Shore."
Like the American highway system, the Academy widen its field to attract more traffic to the broadcast. While The Blind Side's inclusion is a result of filling 10 spots, it shouldn't be an excuse. In the years between 1932 (when the Academy started really structuring the category, then called Outstanding Production) and 1944, there were at least ten films, sometimes as many as thirteen, nominated. In 1939, the 10th and least likely nominee was probably Leo McCrary's A Love Affair. Never heard of it? You have. Unless you never heard of An Affari to Remember or Sleepless in Seattle. This film launched a million rom-coms, and somewhere, Reese Witherspoon and Edward Cullen are probably signed on to develop another. There are dozens of other examples of at least important, if not great, films rounding out the top ten.
Yet, The Blind Side is a cliched, over-produced, two hour foree into white benevolence (and there's no white benevolence like Southern white benevolence). It tells the real-life story of The Tuohey family, who find find, rescue and finance the "it takes a village" adoption and rearing of current Baltimore Ravens tackle Michael Oher. The film has almost no redeeming quality. Least of which is Sandra Bullock's Best Actress nominated portryal of Leigh Anne Tuohey. And, holy Gwenyth Paltrow, Bullock is the favorite. Her performance isn't even in the same ball park as fellow nominees, a pack touting, among others, Meryll Streep's spellbinding transformation into Julia Child, as well as newcomer Carey Mulligan's heart-breaking portrayal of lost youth in An Education.
I am unfamiliar with the real Leigh Anne Tuohey, and I understand that films must simplify characters. But, in Bullock's hands, Tuohey is a card-board cut out of out-of-touch white America. She's a sass talking, "in your face," putting you "in your place," no-nonsense, platitiude-spewing ("don't you lie to me"), Taco Bell product placing protagonist who takes in one Supreme-sized Gordita Crunch. She's pushy, strong and successful, but you guessed it, under her rough exterior is a heart of gold. And, guess what, the homeless boy helps her even more than she helps him.
Sigh.
Tuohey defends her black son with venom, occassionally heading over to "the other side of the tracks" to visit with crackhead moms and beguiling gang bangers. Here, we meet other black people, the only other ones in the film. All are messed up in some way. All are caricatures. All exist to make the rich white people seem superior in their benevolence. Oh, if only there were more like the Tuoheys.
More what? Football obsessed white people? In one particularly unbearable scene, Bullock marches onto the football field, and, armed with the knowledge that, while flunking math, science and language arts, Michael scored in the 98th percentile on a protective instincts test (Huh? What? Protective Instincts exam? Is this a Tennessee thing, because I have never heard of such a test. How is it administered? Do the proctors speak threateningly to koala bears? Hand students crying infants and leave? Incidentally, Michael also scored high in the Interpreting Bodily Urges and Sense of Direction exams). She explains that the "team is your family, Michael." Viola! He's great at football. Makes one wonder why she chose football and not quantum physics. "These telescopes are your family, Michael!"
Along the way, the movie provides the garden variety "something for everyone"-ness that comes standard with a holiday blockbuster. Bullock's dialogue borrows liberally from the Phillip Drummond guide to "stern looks and condescending combacks" Meanwhile, Quinton Aaron, as Michael, responds with dough-eyed, blinking insignificance. He is given no personality whatsoever and is singularly defined by his size and race. But that's the point, isn't it? The Tuoheys themselves are motivated by what Michael can become, not by what he is. If you want to watch a football meaning with something meaningful to say about racial inequality and social justice, rent Remember the Titans.
Otherwise, my blind side was safe. I saw this one coming a mile away.
***NOTES***
Does Kathy Bates have a gambling problem? Because she has landed in some crap movies lately. This may be one of her worst.
Surprise! Tim McGraw is likable and poised as Bullock's laid back husband.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
TCM, I love you.
Dear TCM:
You always know just what to show to make me happy, no matter how bad of a day I've had. I love you.
-Sarah
....Yeah, They're showing Stalag 17 right now. :D TCM has officially made my night. I love this channel. You people should watch it more often! It's awesome.
Ties into what we're learning right now too, WWII and such. A little about the film:
Directed by Billy Wilder, Stalag 17 stars William Holden (as the protagonist J.J. Sefton) and Otto Preminger (as the ruthless Commandant von Sherbach). No one has ever escaped from Stalag 17, a POW camp for American Airmen. Maybe that's because there's a spy in barracks four. The German guards seem to know everything that's about to happen before it happens. Most of the POWs suspect Sgt. J.J. Sefton, whose wheeling-and-dealing tends to gain him special privileges from the camp guards. When Lt. Dubar arrives at the camp and is accused of blowing up an ammunitions train, the POWs must expose the stoolie and help Dunbar escape before the SS arrives to take him away.
Monday, February 8, 2010
WHO DAT!
the Saints made history this weekend!
I was very surprised to see no commercial of Super Bowl quality though. Sure there were good commercials but i didn't see any that jumped out at me.
Sunday, February 7, 2010
34 Days to Go: Precariously Precious/Mo'Nique = Oscar
(NOTE: Sorry I got this posted late...kids, snow, ya know. And yes, I am aware of the apostrophe, but come on!)
Yes, the longest journey begins with a single step. It's the day after Oscar nominations, and I begin my annual pilgrimage to watch, and write about, the Academy Award nominees. All of them. And this year, oh joy, all 10 of them!
We begin with Precious.
True to Paul Brower's (my little Precious) critique below, it seems that another villain is heading toward Oscar gold.
Paul went on a diatribe about villains, claiming that not only are they easier to portray than protagonists, but also that the depth of evil within them is more vital to a film than heroism or strength.
He calls upon a few Oscar-caliber baddies. Yet, Bardem's murderous Dutch Boy in No Country and Ledger's new-age, peeling painted Joker (I have yet to see Basterds, so I cannot comment on Walz's stone-cold Nazi) have one thing in common: a resume of destruction so consummate, it is otherwordly, almost cartoonish. Bardem played a ruthless, stoic predator. Ledger played a lunatic who also dressed the part. Their reign of terror is so encompassing that the protagonists, as well as the audience, can only cower and pray. The hero's job is to stop an insanity so wicked that Susan Powter would leave town.
As a film, Precious, fell short of my expectations. Meandering and filled with generalities, it failed to stand or deliver (ahem). Though admittedly, Paula Patton is much, much, much easier on the eyes than James Edward Olmos. It also seemed to perpetuate some of the stereotypes it aimed to expose. The nurse, the teacher, the professionals...all light-skinned. The abused, the abuser, the accessories to abuse...all dark skinned. One African American critic, acknowledging this disparity in skin tone, hailed that the movie was: "a set back in cinematic portrayals of blacks." He even compared it to Birth of a Nation, a film in which the Ku Klux Klan (literally) marches in and runs out the "sex-starved darkies." Yikes.
While my assessment is less historically scathing, I found the casting for the film to be both curious and unforgivable. Was it an oversight? Or is Daniel's making some sort of indictment of color? Was he hoping we'd notice. Either way, I couldn't get over it. It eclipsed the film's theme. It even eclipsed the fact that Mariah Carey, everyone's favorite public drunk and cleavage purveyor, actually delivered a solid performance as a haggard social worker.
The film is saved from racially-charged cliche by two factors.
One: Lee Daniel's inspired "fantasy" scenes that occur in Precious' imagination. Precious escapes, as we all do, in daydreams of glamour and celebrity. She escapes, as I do, to a soundtrack of early 90s hip-pop (word to Bobby B and Heavy D, the overweight lover MC). These fanatasies provide a ying to the brutual yang of Precious' reality. Bad news accumulates on Precious faster than a Cape May County blizzard. Without these scenes, it would definitely be too much for most viewers to stomach. With them, it is probably too much for most viewers to stomach.
Two: a movingly powerful performance by MoNique. Her welfare mom is a vicous villain on the level with any of Brower's allusions, even Bardem and Ledger. She's a vile and reprehensible woman. She chucks infants. She chucks televisions. She chucks pots and pans. And, she dances to disco with hairy armpits. She hurts everyone in her wake. She hurts animals, kids and old people. Her selfishness and misguidance knows no bounds. Yet, when she cries, during the climatic, final confrontation with her wayward daughter, the effects are crushing. MoNique breathes both evil and humanity into this portrait of destitution and creates a character that will haunt audiences way after the film fades. The product is a masterpiece of acting. MoNique anchors the anguish in Precious, not only the character, but also the film. MoNique deserves and likely will become only the fourth African American woman to win a Best Supporting Actress Oscar. Hopefully, this truth about race and color will prevail where the truth of Precious failed.
Labels:
Brower,
Heath Ledger,
Javier Bardem,
Lee Daniels,
MoNique,
Oscars,
Paula Patton,
Precious
Saturday, February 6, 2010
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
The Big Night
http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/82/nominees.html
Thoughts anybody?
Actor in a Leading Role
- Jeff Bridges in “Crazy Heart”
- George Clooney in “Up in the Air”
- Colin Firth in “A Single Man”
- Morgan Freeman in “Invictus”
- Jeremy Renner in “The Hurt Locker”
Actor in a Supporting Role
- Matt Damon in “Invictus”
- Woody Harrelson in “The Messenger”
- Christopher Plummer in “The Last Station”
- Stanley Tucci in “The Lovely Bones”
- Christoph Waltz in “Inglourious Basterds”
Actress in a Leading Role
- Sandra Bullock in “The Blind Side”
- Helen Mirren in “The Last Station”
- Carey Mulligan in “An Education”
- Gabourey Sidibe in “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire”
- Meryl Streep in “Julie & Julia”
Actress in a Supporting Role
- Penélope Cruz in “Nine”
- Vera Farmiga in “Up in the Air”
- Maggie Gyllenhaal in “Crazy Heart”
- Anna Kendrick in “Up in the Air”
- Mo’Nique in “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire”
Animated Feature Film
- “Coraline” Henry Selick
- “Fantastic Mr. Fox” Wes Anderson
- “The Princess and the Frog” John Musker and Ron Clements
- “The Secret of Kells” Tomm Moore
- “Up” Pete Docter
Art Direction
- “Avatar” Art Direction: Rick Carter and Robert Stromberg; Set Decoration: Kim Sinclair
- “The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Art Direction: Dave Warren and Anastasia Masaro; Set Decoration: Caroline Smith
- “Nine” Art Direction: John Myhre; Set Decoration: Gordon Sim
- “Sherlock Holmes” Art Direction: Sarah Greenwood; Set Decoration: Katie Spencer
- “The Young Victoria” Art Direction: Patrice Vermette; Set Decoration: Maggie Gray
Cinematography
- “Avatar” Mauro Fiore
- “Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince” Bruno Delbonnel
- “The Hurt Locker” Barry Ackroyd
- “Inglourious Basterds” Robert Richardson
- “The White Ribbon” Christian Berger
Costume Design
- “Bright Star” Janet Patterson
- “Coco before Chanel” Catherine Leterrier
- “The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus” Monique Prudhomme
- “Nine” Colleen Atwood
- “The Young Victoria” Sandy Powell
Directing
- “Avatar” James Cameron
- “The Hurt Locker” Kathryn Bigelow
- “Inglourious Basterds” Quentin Tarantino
- “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Lee Daniels
- “Up in the Air” Jason Reitman
Documentary (Feature)
- “Burma VJ” Anders Østergaard and Lise Lense-Møller
- “The Cove” Nominees to be determined
- “Food, Inc.” Robert Kenner and Elise Pearlstein
- “The Most Dangerous Man in America: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers” Judith Ehrlich and Rick Goldsmith
- “Which Way Home” Rebecca Cammisa
Documentary (Short Subject)
- “China’s Unnatural Disaster: The Tears of Sichuan Province” Jon Alpert and Matthew O’Neill
- “The Last Campaign of Governor Booth Gardner” Daniel Junge and Henry Ansbacher
- “The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant” Steven Bognar and Julia Reichert
- “Music by Prudence” Roger Ross Williams and Elinor Burkett
- “Rabbit à la Berlin” Bartek Konopka and Anna Wydra
Film Editing
- “Avatar” Stephen Rivkin, John Refoua and James Cameron
- “District 9” Julian Clarke
- “The Hurt Locker” Bob Murawski and Chris Innis
- “Inglourious Basterds” Sally Menke
- “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Joe Klotz
Foreign Language Film
- “Ajami” Israel
- “El Secreto de Sus Ojos” Argentina
- “The Milk of Sorrow” Peru
- “Un Prophète” France
- “The White Ribbon” Germany
Makeup
- “Il Divo” Aldo Signoretti and Vittorio Sodano
- “Star Trek” Barney Burman, Mindy Hall and Joel Harlow
- “The Young Victoria” Jon Henry Gordon and Jenny Shircore
Music (Original Score)
- “Avatar” James Horner
- “Fantastic Mr. Fox” Alexandre Desplat
- “The Hurt Locker” Marco Beltrami and Buck Sanders
- “Sherlock Holmes” Hans Zimmer
- “Up” Michael Giacchino
Music (Original Song)
- “Almost There” from “The Princess and the Frog” Music and Lyric by Randy Newman
- “Down in New Orleans” from “The Princess and the Frog” Music and Lyric by Randy Newman
- “Loin de Paname” from “Paris 36” Music by Reinhardt Wagner Lyric by Frank Thomas
- “Take It All” from “Nine” Music and Lyric by Maury Yeston
- “The Weary Kind (Theme from Crazy Heart)” from “Crazy Heart” Music and Lyric by Ryan Bingham and T Bone Burnett
Best Picture
- “Avatar” James Cameron and Jon Landau, Producers
- “The Blind Side” Nominees to be determined
- “District 9” Peter Jackson and Carolynne Cunningham, Producers
- “An Education” Finola Dwyer and Amanda Posey, Producers
- “The Hurt Locker” Nominees to be determined
- “Inglourious Basterds” Lawrence Bender, Producer
- “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Lee Daniels, Sarah Siegel-Magness and Gary Magness, Producers
- “A Serious Man” Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, Producers
- “Up” Jonas Rivera, Producer
- “Up in the Air” Daniel Dubiecki, Ivan Reitman and Jason Reitman, Producers
Short Film (Animated)
- “French Roast” Fabrice O. Joubert
- “Granny O’Grimm’s Sleeping Beauty” Nicky Phelan and Darragh O’Connell
- “The Lady and the Reaper (La Dama y la Muerte)” Javier Recio Gracia
- “Logorama” Nicolas Schmerkin
- “A Matter of Loaf and Death” Nick Park
Short Film (Live Action)
- “The Door” Juanita Wilson and James Flynn
- “Instead of Abracadabra” Patrik Eklund and Mathias Fjellström
- “Kavi” Gregg Helvey
- “Miracle Fish” Luke Doolan and Drew Bailey
- “The New Tenants” Joachim Back and Tivi Magnusson
Sound Editing
- “Avatar” Christopher Boyes and Gwendolyn Yates Whittle
- “The Hurt Locker” Paul N.J. Ottosson
- “Inglourious Basterds” Wylie Stateman
- “Star Trek” Mark Stoeckinger and Alan Rankin
- “Up” Michael Silvers and Tom Myers
Sound Mixing
- “Avatar” Christopher Boyes, Gary Summers, Andy Nelson and Tony Johnson
- “The Hurt Locker” Paul N.J. Ottosson and Ray Beckett
- “Inglourious Basterds” Michael Minkler, Tony Lamberti and Mark Ulano
- “Star Trek” Anna Behlmer, Andy Nelson and Peter J. Devlin
- “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” Greg P. Russell, Gary Summers and Geoffrey Patterson
Visual Effects
- “Avatar” Joe Letteri, Stephen Rosenbaum, Richard Baneham and Andrew R. Jones
- “District 9” Dan Kaufman, Peter Muyzers, Robert Habros and Matt Aitken
- “Star Trek” Roger Guyett, Russell Earl, Paul Kavanagh and Burt Dalton
Writing (Adapted Screenplay)
- “District 9” Written by Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell
- “An Education” Screenplay by Nick Hornby
- “In the Loop” Screenplay by Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci, Tony Roche
- “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” Screenplay by Geoffrey Fletcher
- “Up in the Air” Screenplay by Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner
Writing (Original Screenplay)
- “The Hurt Locker” Written by Mark Boal
- “Inglourious Basterds” Written by Quentin Tarantino
- “The Messenger” Written by Alessandro Camon & Oren Moverman
- “A Serious Man” Written by Joel Coen & Ethan Coen
- “Up” Screenplay by Bob Peterson, Pete Docter, Story by Pete Docter, Bob Peterson, Tom McCarthy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)