Sunday, February 27, 2011

The Falcon's Oscar Picks 2011

2010 was a phenomenal year for movies. Even with the Best Picture field recently widened, it felt as if every film deserved a spot. Unlike last year, when we endured stinkers like Avatar and The Blind Side, there were no bad movies in this year's race.

My least favorite offerings, The Kids Are Alright and True Grit, were still good films. Very good films. Best Picture worthy films.

To illuminate the difference between 2010 & 2009, one need go no further than examing the obligatory Coen Brothers offering. Last year's A Serious Man, a metaphoric, but ultimately quizzical foray into modern interpretations of ancient Judaic myth (I think...and I saw it twice, and I'm an English major), left everyone wondering where they missed a serious plot point. (Editor's note: I used all the good puns for this movie last year).

Grit, on the other hand was an atmospheric Coen-ization of a tried and true classic. It teemed with trademark Coen Brothers "dont-know-if-i should-laugh-or-cry" moments.

COSTAL'S WHAT IF HOLLYWOOD PLOT LINE: What if we could resurrect the old, crotchedy and girdled John Wayne from the original True Grit but cast him in a remake of Fargo directed by John Ford?

So, even though a double feature addition to the Costal house has kept me off the blog this season, here's my annual offering of ranked nominees:

10. True Grit: Moody and breath-taking. Hailee Steinfeld ran circles around that Dorothy Hamil bundle of androgeny who starred in the first movie (Nyaw...please find and add her name), but I felt like I was watching The Dude pretend to be The Duke.

9. Kids are Alright: Great performances (just ask the Falcon) and witty script, but at the end of the day I felt like the movie wasn't sure what it wanted to be. Not very funny for a comedy. Too silly for drama. And I hate the word "dramedy." Sounds like something I would take after taco night on a Carnival cruise ship. Were the lesbian stereotypes meant to be satirical? Was there an underlying message that male anatomy can wedge (ahem) itself into any Mommy and Mommy household? But it does have the best line of the year: "Marriage is a marathon." True dat, sisters.

8. 127 Hours: White knuckle thrill ride I watched through my fingers. James Franco, ivy league chic leading man, and Danny Boyle, intense Brit director who came to Oscar gold by way of zombies, are brillant. Franco literally played opposite a boulder and kept me hooked. But the film's short-coming is Boyle's. It felt truncated...amputated, if you will. Unlike Slumdog Millionaire, his Indian epic Best Picture of the '09/'08 season, this movie seemed to NEED Boylle's signature visual asides. He is known to ramble outside the confines of the narrative visually, providing music video-like vignettes within his films that are meant to accent the main plot line. Here they felt like plot fillers, not spices. A dense cranberry stuffing meant to mask a meager Thanksgiving bird. The result made the film seem both overdone and sparse at the same time.

7. Winter's Bone: I love Jennifer Lawrence. I love wolf sweaters. So slam dunk, right? The movie's ambling, journey sometimes played like white trash "Lord of the Rings." Yet, the all gal swamp boat ride was one of the most harrowing scenes of the season.  Kudos for exposing the greatness of John Hawks, though. And Jennifer Lawrence should be Natalie Portman big by next year's ceremony. And I don't mean preggers.

6. Inception: Visually stunning. Epic effects. Decent acting. Just plain fun. But the plot has more holes than Charlie Brown's Halloween costume. Director Chris Nolan will have his time. He rises with Spielberg-like speed to the blockbuster hall of fame. But not this year.

5.  Black Swan: Natalie Portman was phenomenal. The last 25 minutes are a death drive. But overall, the plot seemed overdone and passe. It does unveil the type of genre hybrid I think will become more common as audience tastes mature in our desensitized digital world. Speaking of "Swan Songs..."

4. Toy Story 3: Not a dry-eye in the house as Buzz and Woody take their final (hopefully), computer-generated bows. But the strength is in the trilogy overall, not in this individual installment. Toy Story is Hollywood most dependable brand of the past 15 years. It deserves recognition. But Acadermy voters will find a Best Animated win as praise enough. Otherwise, Oscar rarely gives out series awards like it did in '02 with Return of the King.

3. The Fighter: I didn't have room in my heart for the fighter. I wanted to call it over-rated. I wanted to dismiss it as "just another boxing movie." But the performances, and subsequently, the real-life characters burrowed into my sub-conscious. I found myself pondering Melissa Leo's character for weeks. Evil or misunderstood? Do I pity her or hate her? Does she, in real life, deserve to be applauded by Hollywood at the Oscars? Definitely not, but I suspect she will be.

During the film, I found myself willing Christian Bale's crackhead away from the crackhouse. His character could've gone either way at that climatic moment. Either scenario was plausible. And that's the power of the film. Investment. It's about investing in ourselves and our loved ones despite their trangressions. The film succeeds in demanding the same from its audience. The performances are so nuanced that the audience doesn't perceive the full complications or shades of each character until after the movie ends. That's a sign of greatness.

PS - Forget Black Swan! The sisters in this movie are scarier than any manic killer bird hallucination. Also, Amy Adams cat fight scene was hotter than the Portman/Kunis love scene. Maybe that says more about me than films, but, fahgettaboutit!



2. The King's Speech: Why not Best Picture? A bit dry. A bit short on climax. A bit long in self-importance. A bit too obviously built for the Oscar formula of handicap + Hitler = GOLD! Still, the interplay between Firth and Rush had my brain spewing a thesaurus of critical appraise words: clever, indelible, delightful. Yes, delightful! As lame as it sounds...delightful is the best word for it. Finally! A buddy movie for history buffs...and no cops...or dogs! Woo-hoo! 

1. The Social Network: Few things are as unique or satisfying as an Aaron Sorkin script. Like that guy you used to sit up all night waxing philosophy with in college. You know the one. The only one you couldn't beat at Risk. Its like that guy rings the doorbell, and for a few hours, it's cool to act smart again. You talk fast. You drop obscure pop reference allusions like Arnold dropped the Gooch. 

His dialogue makes me giggle and cringe, and usually, both at the same time. He brought us "you can't handle the truth" and "You want me on that wall!" Social Network is filled with such great one-liners and comeback dialogue moments that students asked me to put on the sub-titles, so they "didn't miss anything." Sigh! Swoon! Sorkin's the Justin Bieber to the twelve year old girl of my soul.

The actors were also phenomenal (Andrew Garfield got robbed). Some gorgeous cinematography (see: everyone making a fuss over the crew scene). The editing and shot sequence moved with a flow that mimiced the technological innovation it tells tale of. Equal doses of legitimate Zuckerberg controversy and cheesy Zuckerberg media stunting (SNL?) make it a perfect homage to "the" Facebook.

But enough about me!

Now, I shall channel the official Film Institute mascot, cinematic soothsayer and six time Tony award winner for his portrayal of Biff in the all-scavenger  production of Death of a Saleshen...The Film Falcon! Here are his official predictions:

Best Picture: King's Speech

Best Director: David Fincher, The Falcon knows its rare that there is an Oscar night split between film and director, but it will happen tonight because Tom Hooper (King's Speech) is too young and most people don't credit his direction as the strength of the film (which is plain silly, but hey, who am I? I'll be wearing sweatpants and holding newborns tonight while the Falcon is talking to E! and learning how to pronounce Bottega Vaneta)

Best Actor: Colin Firth, A Hollywood coronation is held fot a film about a coronation.

UPSET SPECIAL: Best Actress: Annette Bening, Never underestimate Oscar's need to hand at least one award to a winless journey woman who everyone assumes already one, but has not. Conventional wisdom stands that they can give it to Portman another year for a lesser performance. Reference number: Denzel.

Best Supporting Actor: Christian Bale

Best Supporting Actress: Melissa Leo


"The Fighter" Sisters Interview on www.HikariTakano.com from Hikari Takano on Vimeo.

Journals

An enormous grade for the third marking period has come due. Weisback assigned your 20th journal. So, journals will be due for the first half of the year this Friday, March 4th

Thursday, February 24, 2011

House Keeping...

127 Hours/King's Speech criticism due date pushed back till Wednesday, March 2nd. We need to discuss expectations about 50th Anniversary plans. Hold off until that happens.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Saturday, February 19, 2011

Week of February 18th:



Finished viewing 127 Hours and King's Speech. Formal criticism due on either film by Wednesday 2/23. Preliminary (first draft) of movie posters were finished on Friday 2/18.

Next week - Coppola Unit:

The Godfather - my favorite film of all time! You'll see why...

Introduction, biography of Francis Ford Coppola, history of the Mafia, Puzo's novel, and begin viewing The Godfather. Finish work on decades project.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Monday, February 14, 2011

And The Oscar Goes to....You

So...hi....Weisback, I am sure has filled you in on the sordid details of my absence. I shall return soon. In the meantime, here's a fun little writing assignment for you. A great deal was made of Colin Firth's acceptance speech at the BAFTAs. It was a slice-of-life rant in which he likened shooting The King's Speech to a rectal exam. It got me thinking...which is always bad for my students...if you won an Oscar, what would you say in your acceptance speech. Call Journal #19. Dont forget to thank the Academy and your film teachers. Due upon my return. Keep with your journals.

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Waiting for Godot (Costal)

Interlude - Time for a bit of Kubrick


Week of February 11:

Monday 2/7: King's Speech background Information and preparation for the film. True Grit criticism due

Tuesday 2/8: Computer time for project

Wednesday 2/9: The Shining film

Thursday 2/10: Finish viewing The Shining, Complete questions & hand-in on Friday

Friday 2/11: Analysis of the film, Vivian Kubrick's documentary on making The Shining, and reading of reviews on same. Questions on film due, analysis questions due

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Preparation for the Next Criticism

The next criticism will add another essential element to our basic writing structure: scene annotation. The importance of this art is outlined by the following, courtesy of the Dartmouth College Film Writing Department:

The Elements of Composition



Film is an incredibly complex medium. Just take a look at the credits at the end of any film. Each of the people listed there has contributed something essential to the film's production - from lighting, to sound, to wardrobe, to editing, to special effects. Because there's so much to talk about, you'll have to be selective if you want to write a good, focused essay.

50 Years at the Movies Assignment

Part 1: The movie montage or "trailer:" Should be between one and three minutes long. Piece should illustrate the best movies of your time period with specific evidence upon the two seminal films you locked in. Can be "narrative" in that it tells a story. Can be "abstract" in that the images are not linear but present a "feeling" for your time period. Aim should be a representation of your time period. Due date and rubric depend on Lockwood & Thomas.

Part 2: The poster: Again, should aim to be aesthetically pleasing and aim to capture the "spirit of your time period in cinema." Should reflect a theme that is reflective of the times.

Answer to "What is a Montage?"

True Grit -- The Paper


We are going to ease back into our writing with a short criticism, one that actually borders on a review. Follow the structural guidelines of this assignment as they are outlined below. I do not care if you do not like this assignment. You will oblige me. I reckon that I can be offering you time in class to complete this mission.

Paragraph One: An introduction, something that establishes your like or dislike for the film while opening with an interesting, maybe personal (?), anecdotal connection to the film or one of its elements.