Monday, October 20, 2014

The Place Beyond the Pines

Derek Cianfrance is an ambitious young director, and The Place Beyond Pines is his attempt at a masterpiece. It's long, complicated, and mythic in its scope.


It's part Shakespeare in its treatment of the legacy that fathers leave their sons.

It's Dickensian in its length and its exploration of poverty and desperation.

And Springsteen-esque in its portrayal of working class America.

This is a divisive movie. Critics applauded its aspirations, but ultimately felt that parts of the film were stronger than others.

Your Task

  • Give your review of the film.
    • Does Cianfrance succeed or is the film uneven? Explain.
  • Explain the film's connection to the archetypal Hamlet.
    • How is the film's treatment/exploration of fathers and sons similar to Hamlet's?
Your responses must be posted as comments to this post.
Responses are due before Friday (10/24) of this week.

Thursday, October 16, 2014

SOLILOQUY GROUPS


Kubrick Paper Updates


  • Your completed Kubrick papers are due Monday, October 20th. Please submit a typed, hard copy.
  • Extra credit if you take pictures at Friday's bonfire. 


Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Hamlet Soliloquy Film Project

THE SOLILOQUY FILM PROJECT

Directions:  Each group will be responsible for producing a cinematic interpretation of an assigned soliloquy from Hamlet.
The rules are as follows:
  • ·        It is your interpretation so how you film it is your choice.

o   Modernize it; set it in space; have fun!
  • ·        You must have a group of three.
  • ·        You cannot use outside people to act or to film.
  • ·        Your assigned soliloquy, selected at random, must be presented in its entirety.

o   You may not delete words or lines!
  • ·        The way in which you choose to deliver/film your project must take into consideration what the lines are saying about Hamlet and his emotional/mental state.
  • ·        Production design—costumes, sets, lighting, etc.—must reflect the emotional timbre of your assigned soliloquy
  • ·        You may film in the building or in other locations outside of school.

o   The latter will require some coordination outside of school.
  • ·        Your film should include all of the following:

o   TITLE & What part of the play the soliloquy comes from
§  “Melting Flesh”: Act I, Scene 2
o   Fade in to action
o   Fade out to black at end
o   CREDITS – the team members and their roles

#1
Act I, Scene 2
O, that this too too solid flesh would melt
Thaw and resolve itself into a dew!
Or that the Everlasting had not fix'd
His canon 'gainst self-slaughter! O God! God!
How weary, stale, flat and unprofitable,
Seem to me all the uses of this world!
Fie on't! ah fie! 'tis an unweeded garden,
That grows to seed; things rank and gross in nature
Possess it merely. That it should come to this!
But two months dead: nay, not so much, not two:
So excellent a king; that was, to this,
Hyperion to a satyr; so loving to my mother
That he might not beteem the winds of heaven
Visit her face too roughly. Heaven and earth!
Must I remember? why, she would hang on him,
As if increase of appetite had grown
By what it fed on: and yet, within a month--
Let me not think on't--Frailty, thy name is woman!--
A little month, or ere those shoes were old
With which she follow'd my poor father's body,
Like Niobe, all tears:--why she, even she--
O, God! a beast, that wants discourse of reason,
Would have mourn'd longer--married with my uncle,
My father's brother, but no more like my father
Than I to Hercules: within a month:
Ere yet the salt of most unrighteous tears
Had left the flushing in her galled eyes,
She married. O, most wicked speed, to post
With such dexterity to incestuous sheets!
It is not nor it cannot come to good:
But break, my heart; for I must hold my tongue.
#2
Act II, Scene 2
Now I am alone.
O, what a rogue and peasant slave am I!
Is it not monstrous that this player here,
But in a fiction, in a dream of passion,
Could force his soul so to his own conceit
That from her working all his visage wann'd,
Tears in his eyes, distraction in's aspect,
A broken voice, and his whole function suiting
With forms to his conceit? and all for nothing!
For Hecuba!
What's Hecuba to him, or he to Hecuba,
That he should weep for her? What would he do,
Had he the motive and the cue for passion
That I have? He would drown the stage with tears
And cleave the general ear with horrid speech,
Make mad the guilty and appal the free,
Confound the ignorant, and amaze indeed
The very faculties of eyes and ears. Yet I,
A dull and muddy-mettled rascal, peak,
Like John-a-dreams, unpregnant of my cause,
And can say nothing; no, not for a king,
Upon whose property and most dear life
A damn'd defeat was made. Am I a coward?
Who calls me villain? breaks my pate across?
Plucks off my beard, and blows it in my face?
Tweaks me by the nose? gives me the lie i' the throat,
As deep as to the lungs? who does me this?
Ha!
'Swounds, I should take it: for it cannot be
But I am pigeon-liver'd and lack gall
To make oppression bitter, or ere this
I should have fatted all the region kites
With this slave's offal: bloody, bawdy villain!
Remorseless, treacherous, lecherous, kindless villain!
O, vengeance!
Why, what an ass am I! This is most brave,
That I, the son of a dear father murder'd,
Prompted to my revenge by heaven and hell,
Must, like a whore, unpack my heart with words,
And fall a-cursing, like a very drab,
A scullion!
Fie upon't! foh! About, my brain! I have heard
That guilty creatures sitting at a play
Have by the very cunning of the scene
Been struck so to the soul that presently
They have proclaim'd their malefactions;
For murder, though it have no tongue, will speak
With most miraculous organ. I'll have these players
Play something like the murder of my father
Before mine uncle: I'll observe his looks;
I'll tent him to the quick: if he but blench,
I know my course. The spirit that I have seen
May be the devil: and the devil hath power
To assume a pleasing shape; yea, and perhaps
Out of my weakness and my melancholy,
As he is very potent with such spirits,
Abuses me to damn me: I'll have grounds
More relative than this: the play 's the thing
Wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king.
#3
Act III, Scene 1
To be, or not to be: that is the question:
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep;
To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub;
For in that sleep of death what dreams may come
When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,
Must give us pause: there's the respect
That makes calamity of so long life;
For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
The oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely,
The pangs of despised love, the law's delay,
The insolence of office and the spurns
That patient merit of the unworthy takes,
When he himself might his quietus make
With a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscover'd country from whose bourn
No traveller returns, puzzles the will
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;
And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought,
And enterprises of great pith and moment
With this regard their currents turn awry,
And lose the name of action.--Soft you now!
The fair Ophelia! Nymph, in thy orisons
Be all my sins remember'd.
#4
Act IV, Scene 4

How all occasions do inform against me,
And spur my dull revenge! What is a man,
If his chief good and market of his time
Be but to sleep and feed? a beast, no more.
Sure, he that made us with such large discourse,
Looking before and after, gave us not
That capability and god-like reason
To fust in us unused. Now, whether it be
Bestial oblivion, or some craven scruple
Of thinking too precisely on the event,
A thought which, quarter'd, hath but one part wisdom
And ever three parts coward, I do not know
Why yet I live to say 'This thing's to do;'
Sith I have cause and will and strength and means
To do't. Examples gross as earth exhort me:
Witness this army of such mass and charge
Led by a delicate and tender prince,
Whose spirit with divine ambition puff'd
Makes mouths at the invisible event,
Exposing what is mortal and unsure
To all that fortune, death and danger dare,
Even for an egg-shell. Rightly to be great
Is not to stir without great argument,
But greatly to find quarrel in a straw
When honour's at the stake. How stand I then,
That have a father kill'd, a mother stain'd,
Excitements of my reason and my blood,
And let all sleep? while, to my shame, I see
The imminent death of twenty thousand men,
That, for a fantasy and trick of fame,
Go to their graves like beds, fight for a plot
Whereon the numbers cannot try the cause,
Which is not tomb enough and continent
To hide the slain? O, from this time forth,
My thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth!

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

The Kubrick Paper

Pictured: a student visualizes the horror of essay writing.

Your film analysis papers, due Friday, October 17th, need to consist of a scholarly analysis of one or more of the major interpretative theories concerning the film, The Shining.
    • I strongly recommend picking only one to focus on, unless you pick related theories, i.e. mythology and fairy tales.
Here are some ideas to consider in your paper:
  • The Native American Genocide 
  • The Holocaust
  • Greek Mythology: Theseus, the Minotaur, and the Labryinth
  • Apollo 11 and the faked moon landing
  • The Shining as a parody/update of Gothic Horror [Easiest topic, in my opinion]
  • Fairy Tales
  • The Blood on Which Nations Are Built: A Judgment on Humanity
  • Freudian analysis
  • Compare/contrast The Shining to 2001: A Space Odyssey [Ooh... this one is interesting!]

Outline
I. Intro 
   A. Introduction/explanation of your theory
   B. Thesis: a complex sentence or sentences indicating specifically what your paper will prove
II. Body 1 
   A. Quote or idea from a source
   B. Analysis of the aforementioned idea supported by specific references to the film
III. Body 2
   A. Quote or idea from a source
   B. Analysis of the aforementioned idea supported by specific references to the film
IV. Body 3
   A. Quote or idea from a source
   B. Analysis of the aforementioned idea supported by specific references to the film
V. Conclusion - Revisit the thesis and the main ideas explored in the paper
VI. Works Cited - Appears on a separate page; does not count towards the overall length


Sources
  • You may use information that appears from the excerpt from the book, On Kubrick. We read chapter V: "Horrorshow."
  • I also recommend the following site: http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/amk/
  • You must find a third source on your own. It must come from a book, an article, or a scholarly website.
  • This site lists the basic elements of Gothic fiction: http://www.virtualsalt.com/gothic.htm

Format/Citation

  • The paper must be properly MLA formatted. It must contain multiple in-text citations, and the works cited must be properly formatted.
  • If there are no in-text citations and no works cited page, the paper is technically plagiarized. Anticipate an automatic failure.
  • The best source of information regarding MLA formatting is the Online Writing Lab of Purdue University: The OWL.
  • The proper MLA works cited entry for the book, On Kubrick, is as follows:
    • Naremore, James. On Kubrick. London: British Film Institute, 2007. Print.
  • To use information from the book in the essay, you must use an in-text citation. There are two ways to do this correctly.
    • Firstly, you may opt to simply mention the title of the book and the author. Then, you simply need to include the page number in paranthesis.
      • In On Kubrick, the author, James Naremore, postulates that The Shining is a Freudian horror film that portrays Jack Torrance as a terrifying, nightmarish father figure (287).
    • Secondly, you may simply include a quote or idea from the excerpt without mentioning the author or the title. In this case, the parenthetical in-text citation must include the author's last name and a page number.
      • The Shining is a Freudian horror film that portrays Jack Torrance as a terrifying, nightmarish father figure (Naremore 287).

Due Date/Requirements

  • Size 12, Times New Roman font
  • Double-spaced
  • No cover page!
  • MLA header/page numbers
  • 1" margins
  • No hanging indents
  • Complex thesis statement
  • At least 6 in-text citations
  • Multiple specific references to the film itself
  • 3 scholarly sources all of which must be used in the body of the paper
  • 3-5 pages; the works cited page gets its own page; it does not count towards the overall length
    • The completed paper is due on Friday, October 17th.
    • A hard copy must be submitted in person!

Thursday, October 2, 2014

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

since its october-heres my favorite halloween movie pics

Since its officially fall, and thrill of Halloween is now in the air, here's my top picks for Horror/Suspense films that I think are must see's in this category and why (in no particular order).

28 Days Later-Directed by Danny Boyle
He kickstarted the Romero zombie craze all over again in the early 00's with this gritty take on zombies. It deals with an infection of rage, turning humans over to the dark side to prey on them in the afterlife. Great cast of character actors here, traversing their way through the UK, looking for salvation, humanity and a cure.

The Shining-Directed by Stanley Kubrick
Its Kubrick. And Stephen King. What more needs to be said about this classic? Psychological thriller meets suspense meets horror. The classic visual storytelling and classic acting from Jack Nicholson at the height of his career provide a great backdrop for the character and story evolution that we see take place throughout this visual masterpiece.

Season 1 of The Walking Dead-Directed by Frank Darabont
The director of The Shawshank Redemption and The Green Mile was brought in as a developer and director on the first season of the AMC original program that pushed the boundaries of what could be aired on cable tv. His eye for color, cinematic visual technique, and use of silence to heighten suspense are all qualities which give his films a certain look/feel. The reason I put this first season in with the aforementioned films, is because it plays out like a film. The first few episodes are similar in length and storytelling style to that of a feature film. Not to leave out the spectacular makeup and special effects from now executive producer Greg Nicotero, this first season is as close to the real zombie apocalypse as you can get-without getting blood on you!

Nightmare on Elm Street-Directed by Wes Craven
A legendary scary villain like Freddy Kruger doesn't often come along-he's the equivalent of our Heath Ledger Joker. So outlandishly creepy and in a time and place most of us can relate to-a  bad dream. The film plays up the realistic insecurities of every human, both in reality and subconsciously. Plus-its Johnny Depp's first big-time starring role, and the film really showcases some great special effects of the time period.

Halloween-Directed by John Carpenter
Made on a shoestring budget with his wife and then unknown Jamie Lee Curtis, Carpenter crafts a classic teen slasher thriller that still delivers to this day. It kickstarted the franchise that just won't seem to die, like its main bad guy (Michael Myers). So the name has been dragged through the mud a bit, but this original version takes place on Halloween and can still creep you out a little with its great use of music and silence throughout if you decide to watch it alone in the dark.

Night of the Living Dead-George Romero
The film and the director that started it all-here we see the zombie apocalypse come to fruition successfully for the first time, thanks to great makeup, cinematography, some great acting performances and methodical directing from Romero to get the most out his zombies. Even though it may look a little hokey to most modern zombie film buffs, you really have to appreciate the seriousness with which he's trying to tell this story of survival.

Feel free to comment if you feel differently or think I left something off of my list.

Happy watching!